http://www.whitneylewisphotography.com/Blog/wedding/whats-in-a-name-formal-vs-groomals-vs-bride-and-groom-178 Wedding and Portrait Photography in Utah Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:36:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.whitneylewisphotography.com/Blog/wedding/whats-in-a-name-formal-vs-groomals-vs-bride-and-groom-178/comment-page-1#comment-7 chelsea Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:29:40 +0000 http://www.whitneylewisphotography.com/Blog/?p=178#comment-7 Take away the wedding dress and you've got formals. If there is a wedding dress, I think it should probably be acknowledged. Groomals is a weird word that accents TOO much on the groom (it's not just of the groom, it's of both), so to me, by process of elimination, I'd say Bride and Groom. Not that it's great, it's just the best of those options. Take away the wedding dress and you’ve got formals. If there is a wedding dress, I think it should probably be acknowledged. Groomals is a weird word that accents TOO much on the groom (it’s not just of the groom, it’s of both), so to me, by process of elimination, I’d say Bride and Groom. Not that it’s great, it’s just the best of those options.

]]> http://www.whitneylewisphotography.com/Blog/wedding/whats-in-a-name-formal-vs-groomals-vs-bride-and-groom-178/comment-page-1#comment-6 Liann Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:39:12 +0000 http://www.whitneylewisphotography.com/Blog/?p=178#comment-6 What about Bride and Groom Formals? Combine the two. Or is that too long of a name? What about Bride and Groom Formals? Combine the two. Or is that too long of a name?

]]>